Home Health News CDC chief defends failure to spot early coronavirus spread in U.S. – Thehour.com

CDC chief defends failure to spot early coronavirus spread in U.S. – Thehour.com

15 min read

WASHINGTON – The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday defended the agency’s failure to find early spread of the coronavirus in the United States, noting that surveillance systems “kept eyes” on the disease.

“We were never really blind when it came to surveillance” for covid-19, the disease caused by the virus, CDC chief Robert Redfield said. Even if widespread diagnostic testing had been in place, it would have been like “looking for a needle in a haystack,” he said.

Redfield was among three CDC officials who spoke with reporters Friday about a comprehensive analysis by the agency that found the coronavirus began spreading in the United States as early as the second half of January, eluding detection by public health surveillance systems that help monitor for early signs of novel contagions.

Reporters who received the report had requested to speak with experts. It was the first such CDC briefing in nearly three months.

The report looked at public health surveillance data, confirmed cases of covid-19 and the transmission of distinct genetic strains of the virus. The results are consistent with other scientific studies that have described a two-stage viral attack that began in January on the West Coast with the coronavirus introduced by travelers from China and continued in February as travelers from Europe brought the virus to the East Coast. Most of the virus spreading in the United States can be traced to the introductions from Europe.

Redfield said the findings debunk speculation the virus was circulating months earlier.

“There was one opinion that was circulating that in November, December and January, there was, if you will, significant seeding of the nation,” Redfield said. “And what this data clearly shows is by four independent lines of evidence, that the early introduction of this virus in the Northwest and Northern California was sometime between the second week of January and the second week of February.”

Jay Butler, CDC’s deputy director for infectious diseases, said the findings also show that transmission was limited and not as widespread as some experts have suggested.

Addressing the botched CDC rollout of test kits that experts say allowed the virus to take hold and spread quickly, Redfield said diagnostic testing would have made little difference at that time. When U.S. cases were first detected in January and February, health officials identified about 800 high-risk individuals who had been in contact with infected patients. Only two of those people tested positive, he said.

Still, that doesn’t mean officials should simply wait for the needles “to replicate themselves until they are the haystack,” said William Hanage, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

“There’s a succession of missed opportunities here,” he said. “Surveillance at the time was wholly inadequate to the task of catching a pandemic virus of this sort, whenever it was introduced.”

Michael Worobey, a University of Arizona evolutionary biologist who is lead author of a new paper analyzing the early spread of the virus in the United States, said his research indicates community spread on the West Coast probably did not begin before the first week in February. That is just a few weeks after the first Washington state patient arrived on a flight from Wuhan, China, but, to Worobey, that was potentially enough time to take action to limit the outbreak.

“It would be absurd to not recognize that there were some failings in the way testing was rolled out,” Worobey said.

He said details of the introduction and spread of the virus are crucial to understanding exactly what happened and what could be done to prevent future outbreaks.

“When a plane crashes, it’s very impressive the way these thing are investigated right down to every single fragment of debris so that we figure out what went wrong without trying to brush anything under the carpet,” he said.

The genetic data that was part of the evidence in the report underscores the ease with which the virus entered the country and began spreading before the rollout of widespread testing or contact tracing, and also before the Trump administration banned most travel from China, starting Feb. 2, and Europe, on March 13.

A paper published Friday in the journal Science found that New York City was seeded with the virus at least eight times in separate events, the first perhaps as early as late January. The earliest introductions came from people with known travel histories and were not linked to later community clusters, the report said.

But outbreaks still happened, and the virus samples can be traced to Europe, “likely reflecting local transmissions from undetected introductions,” the paper states. Only one of the virus sequences, introduced in mid-February, became highly successful in spreading in New York City, said the paper’s lead author, Ana Silvia Gonzalez-Reiche, a virologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. There is no laboratory evidence this sequence was more contagious or dangerous than others, she said. “It looks like it was luck,” she said.

Testing didn’t expand until mid-March. If more testing had been available in January and February, researchers would have had a better chance of discerning the scale and speed of the outbreak, experts said.

“What this points to is how incredibly unfortunate it was that we didn’t have broad-based surveillance early,” said Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist and senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

“We lost several months’ time where we would have been able to isolate people and prevent the cases from accelerating as we did,” she said.

In the absence of better testing, the researchers tried to reconstruct what happened. They examined four pieces of epidemiological data to understand whether the virus was circulating in the community before the identification of a patient Feb. 26 in California who was previously thought to be the first confirmed case of community spread.

The researchers concluded there was likely community transmission of covid-19 in the United States as early as mid-January, with the first such case identified in a woman who became ill in late January and died Feb. 6 in California.

The investigation showed low-level community transmission was happening as early as late January in California and Washington state, after importation of cases from China. But the level was too low for anyone to notice, and emergency departments saw no spike in patients with symptoms consistent with covid-19.

That, too, is consistent with what is know about community transmission: It takes time, many weeks, to reach a critical mass that triggers alarms. A retrospective analysis of more than 11,000 stored respiratory samples collected starting Jan. 1 showed no positive tests for covid-19 until Feb. 21 in Washington state. The virus was already circulating but at a level below the epidemiological radar.

The report concludes that “sustained, community transmission had begun” before the virus was detected in two cases in California and Washington state at the end of February. Those were the first U.S. patients with no travel history to China.

Researchers said spread probably came from “importation of a single lineage of virus from China in late January or early February, followed by several importations from Europe.”

The report suggests procedures in place for contact tracing were no match for a virus that could spread from asymptomatic patients.

The CDC report raises intriguing speculation about how the first known case in the United States may have initiated a spread in a fashion so stealthy that it was impossible to discern at the time. The authors of the study note that investigators did rigorous contact tracing for the first patient. But they did not examine all of the patient’s contacts before symptoms appeared. At that point, the standard protocol in contact tracing did not extend to potential presymptomatic spread, the CDC said.

And in another wrinkle, the contact tracing did not look at secondary contacts – people who had been in contact with the first circle of contacts. Thus, it is possible the patient transmitted the virus to someone who never developed symptoms, and who then transmitted it to someone who became one of the community spreaders.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link


  1. ปั้มไลค์

    May 30, 2020 at 12:07 pm

    Like!! I blog quite often and I genuinely thank you for your information. The article has truly peaked my interest.


  2. A big thank you for your article.


  3. Thank you ever so for you article post.


  4. เบอร์มงคล

    June 8, 2020 at 8:37 am

    I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This article posted at this web site is in fact pleasant.


  5. SMS

    June 14, 2020 at 8:42 pm

    These are actually great ideas in concerning blogging.


  6. g want

    June 21, 2020 at 2:19 am

    Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing around your blog
    posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you
    write again soon!


  7. all g

    June 21, 2020 at 1:45 pm

    I love what you guys are up too. This type of clever work and exposure!
    Keep up the wonderful works guys I’ve added you
    guys to blogroll.


  8. g rsacwgxy

    June 22, 2020 at 1:04 am

    Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the pictures on this blog loading?

    I’m trying to find out if its a problem on my end
    or if it’s the blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.


  9. featur.vs120084.hl-users.com

    June 27, 2020 at 4:00 am

    My coder is trying to persuade me to move to .net from
    PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs.
    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on various websites for about a year
    and am concerned about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!


  10. web hosting reviews

    July 18, 2020 at 5:51 am

    Hi there, I enjoy reading through your article.
    I like to write a little comment to support you.


  11. website hosting companies

    July 25, 2020 at 10:31 pm

    What’s up, every time i used to check blog posts here in the early hours in the
    daylight, because i like to gain knowledge of more and more.


  12. best web hosting company

    July 27, 2020 at 12:20 am

    Pretty! This was a really wonderful post. Thank you for supplying this


  13. insanely cheap flights

    July 27, 2020 at 10:49 am

    Hello to all, it’s really a good for me to go to
    see this web site, it contains precious Information.


  14. best web hosting 2020

    August 26, 2020 at 2:20 am

    Thanks for the good writeup. It in truth used
    to be a leisure account it. Glance advanced to far delivered agreeable from you!
    However, how could we communicate?


  15. poker online

    November 22, 2020 at 7:30 am

    idn poker, idn poker 88, poker idn, idn poker apk, idn play poker, idn poker online, poker idn bonus 20, poker idn play, download idn poker, situs poker idn, idn poker terbaru, daftar idn poker, idn poker 99, situs idn poker online, agen idn poker, poker server idn, idn poker versi terbaru, daftar poker idn, poker idn terbaru, poker idn bonus new member 20, cara daftar idn poker, idn poker play, bonus poker idn, poker idn terbaik, idn poker download, poker server idn play, poker online idn, poker idn bonus new member, cara hack idn poker, masuk idn poker, situs poker idn play, idn poker pulsa, idn poker asia, login idn poker, idn poker nusaplay, agen poker idn, hack idn poker, cs idn poker, poker idn bonus new member 30, idn poker deposit pulsa tanpa potongan, download idn poker pc, idn poker login, idn poker qq, download idn poker apk, judi poker idn, kumpulan poker idn, situs poker idn terbaik, live chat idn poker, poker idn online, idn poker aplikasi, poker online, situs poker online, online poker, poker online terpercaya, poker online 88, judi poker online, dewa poker online, game poker online, poker online cc, texas holdem poker online, situs poker online terpercaya, daftar poker online terbaru, daftar poker online, poker pelangi online, 99 online poker, rajapoker88 situs agen judi poker bandar domino qq online terpercaya, turn poker online, poker galaxy online, texas hold em poker online, situs judi poker online, poker online pakai uang asli, poker online terpercaya 2018, poker online free, poker online terbaik, poker qq online, poker online terpercaya 2019, qq online poker, qq poker online, club poker online, download aplikasi poker online android, poker qiu qiu online, poker 88 asia online, domino poker online, kartu poker online, cara main poker online, daftar poker online terpercaya 2018, agen poker online terpercaya, poker 99 online, poker online indonesia terbaik, cara bermain poker online, poker online indonesia, poker club 88 online, poker online tanpa deposit awal, poker online uang asli bank bni, idn poker online, poker free online, cara membobol chip poker online, poker757 com agen judi poker online terpercaya indonesia, poker online 77, download poker online


  16. Roger Ocana

    December 24, 2020 at 8:16 am

    This implies with $100 you just play in a game with $10. Loaning to gamble is never ever a good idea. To keep it real though, even if you aren’t a fan of Hoyt’s, the poker chips are the very best I’ve ever seen.


  17. game casino online

    December 24, 2020 at 9:15 am

    Ten film motywuje Cię do samodzielnego grania


  18. Rogelio Trinka

    January 6, 2021 at 10:00 am

    On-line poker sites require to have credit card information so you can play for money. You might not be successful in sticking to it, but to attempt that will do you no damage. The Royal Road to Card Magic could be just the solution.


  19. Zackary Kutt

    January 31, 2021 at 8:25 pm

    she lost 1.1 lbs every day with THIS japanese fat-loss tonic Marina fell into a deep depression after packing on so much fat in her 20’s. So she started working out… tracking calories… and jogging every day to burn it off. Yet, after 4 weeks of grueling work, and not a single cheat meal… she only lost a couple of pounds. Frustrating! Meanwhile, 45-year-old Susan simply drank one cup of THIS delicious Japanese fat-loss tonic every morning… and melted 54lbs off her belly, thighs, and upper arms in just 7 weeks. (With NO exercise due to arthritis in her damaged knee.) Here’s how: ==> One cup of THIS Japanese fat-loss tonic every morning helped Susan melt 54lbs in 7 weeks (it’s delicious!) Read more here => https://tinyurl.com/y6hzj4t7


  20. Anastacia Deprizio

    February 9, 2021 at 10:35 am

    Response has been tremendous to this new system I guess that’s because if you can order a pizza, you literally have all the skills you need to make this system work for you. http://tvc.in/2vp3l


  21. order viagra online

    February 27, 2021 at 10:40 pm

  22. sbo

    April 22, 2021 at 10:11 pm

    Hello! I’ve been reading your weblog for a while now and finally
    got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Humble Tx!

    Just wanted to tell you keep up the good work!


  23. Chante Fosson

    May 10, 2021 at 1:11 pm

    Have you ever heard of second life (sl for short). It is basically a game where you can do anything you want. SL is literally my second life (pun intended lol). If you would like to see more you can see these Second Life articles and blogs


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

British Nutrition Foundation to launch Healthy Eating Week – New Food

The BNF is launching a new event to encourage people from all ages to improve their health…